News sources may offer specific insights and take time to get there, but they can also be beneficial for staying updated with the latest happenings. For example, news organizations are good sources for determining people’s actions, opinions, and prevailing attitudes about events or happenings. For centuries, the news was transmitted only in newspapers, but with time and transformation in technology, it reformed itself by adding radio, television, and online mediums like websites and apps. Several media outlets in the United States are trusted sources of information in the country and worldwide. Some news networks are considered worthy due to their big audience numbers, and some due to their credibility. CNN is the most famous and most-watched news channel since its commencement in 1980. However, the question arises: Is CNN reliable to watch, and why check its reliability regularly?
CNN is the most-honored news brand, reaching more people on TV and online than any other U.S. cable news outlet. CNN International is accessible by many people worldwide, reaching over two hundred countries and territories. The leading online news destination is CNN Digital, attracting more unique visitors than all other news sources combined. The award-winning portfolio of CNN has original series from CNN Original Series and CNN Films to broadcast, stream, and distribute across numerous platforms.
One can catch CNN programming on CNN, CNN International, CNN En Espanol, the CNN Originals hub on Discovery+, Max, and subscriptions for pay-TV, CNN.com, LiveNewsPro, CNN apps, and cable operator platforms. Moreover, CNN Newsource is the most significant news service, having agreements with more than 1,000 partners worldwide. Let’s discuss whether CNN is a reliable news source or not.
IS CNN Reliable News Source?
According to the report, CNN was the most trusted political news source in 2014, compared to ABC, NBC, CBS, and Fox News, among 40% of adults who had heard of these companies. On the contrary, at the time of the ex-CEO Jeff Zucker, the network’s reliability was debatable to analysts. Viewers commented more about its credibility, even during the Trump Administration. For example, Anderson Cooper is one of the network’s popular broadcasters; he compared Trump to “an obese turtle on its back, flailing in the hot sun, realizing his time is over.” In this relatively recent tone shift, has CNN been reliable?
Does Reliability Matter?
In general, reliability means that a piece of information, or in this case, a news source, can be trusted to be truthful or accurate. Considering this definition, we soon understand why we need the reliability of media sources. It is essential to trust the source because if it is unreliable, why should we continue reading from it? Anyway, how can we judge the credibility of a news source?
When attempting to determine the reliability of a media source, one may look out for several reliability measures. For instance, the unreliable article may contain wild and unsupported claims or facts that rely on other unreliable sources and abundant opinionated language, among others. Some indicators of reliable news sources include things like:
- No subjective or opinionated language was found in the articles. The posture of the body is also very important
- Credible sources cited
- Multiple outside sources with facts and statistics
- Use such primary resources as much as possible
- Different news sources repeat some information
How Does CNN Fair in its Coverage?
We assessed CNN’s reliability score using Biasly’s political bias indicator, which reached 79%. Such a score reflects the average reliability of any CNN article you may come across on any internet platform, though some articles may exceed or fall short of this figure. In comparison, its primary rival, Fox News, scored an 82% accuracy rating.
CNN Accuracy and Reliability/ Is CNN Reliable?
Reliability in news is highly dependent on political leanings and bias in its coverage. Many people have often alleged CNN’s liking for political bias instead of sticking to the facts. This has cast doubts on CNN’s credibility and left it with a tarnished name. But to what extent is this true? You can demonstrate it by checking the truthfulness of the channel’s news stories. In other words, examining whether a network can support its facts is important. When checking whether the information in an article is factual and properly presented, you should observe whether omission or selection bias is involved.
One may pick or reject stories and facts depending on their ideological basis to substantiate the new source’s ideology. However, omission bias occurs when views concerning a particular situation are excluded, such as considering only the author’s supported political opinion.
When determining the truthfulness of a news story, it is crucial to consider these two forms of bias. One can measure on a bias scale from zero to 100, where 100 is best. The factual reason and source are counted claims, and a credible external source is cited in each story. Based on 18 stories rated by CNN’s analysts, it scored a reliability index of 79%, translating to decently reliable average news events broadcasted by this channel. The channel’s credibility will be analyzed further by incorporating instances of selection and omission bias and the sources of evidence and facts provided.
Reliability Analysis in CNN Opinion Pieces
So far, we have covered opinions that must be avoided during reliable reporting. However, it is not a general principle of all forms of journalism. You can categorize opinion pieces as under-reporting but do not follow the objectivity rule. They are intended to allow people who want to express a certain viewpoint to gain readers’ support on a case. These are often subjective articles and, therefore, are less reliable. Nonetheless, they can sometimes still be worth reading to expand the intellectual horizon on different aspects of the spectrum.
For instance, CNN’s reliability problem has been spreading the falsified hate crime narrative of Jussie Smollett in the past years, denying and diminishing the Hunter Biden laptop story, and misrepresenting Joe Rogan’s use of Ivermectin. However, CNN’s devotion to such narratives and others has been detrimental to its reliability and ratings, costing the reporters, anchors, pundits, and the network their reliability and ratings.
Conclusion
In conclusion, CNN is only sometimes reliable depending on the current circumtances. The network is reliable to some extent and varies from event to event. Overall, we give CNN a leaning left bias due to the TV host’s positions generally favoring the left, and the straight news reporting is lean left-center due to bias by omission. Two fact checks missed in the last five years earned them a Mostly Factual rating in the reporting field. However, some authors succeed in being neutral by providing only reports. In contrast, others fail, and as you keep reading online articles and see that they are rated with bias, you will see reliability indicators and become media literate.